|
What is
Ballistic Imaging?
Ballistic
imaging technology can be a useful tool in the investigation of
crimes committed with firearms. As currently used, forensic experts
are able to electronically scan into a database a shell casing(s)
recovered from a crime scene to determine if those case(s) match
those from other crime scenes. The technology can serve as a
starting point in assisting law enforcement in determining if the
same firearm was involved in multiple crimes.
The federal
government has worked for nearly 10 years on developing an imaging
network. The National Integrated Ballistic Information Network (NIBIN),
administered by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (BATF),
provides federal, state, and local law enforcement officials with
critical ballistics information on crimes committed with a firearm.
This system matches shell casings recovered from crime scenes to
ascertain if a firearm has been used in multiple assaults. By
focusing strictly on cases recovered from crime scenes, NIBIN can
not be used to build a database of firearms owners thereby
guaranteeing the security and legal rights of millions of Americans
who are law-abiding gun owners.
How Does it
Work?
When a firearm
is discharged, both the shell casing and the bullet traveling down
the barrel of the gun are imprinted with distinctive marks. The
bullet takes on marks from the barrel's rifling, and the casing is
marked by the gun's breech face, firing pin and shell ejector
mechanism (Note: This depends on the type of firearm used. Some
guns, such as revolvers or single-shot rifles might not leave
ejection marks.) These imprints are distinctive to a firearm. A
ballistic imaging program can run a casing through its database and
select those that offer a close match. A final identification is
made visually by a highly trained ballistic examiner. This process
does not lend itself to examining bullets from a firearm. Often,
bullets are severely damaged on impact. Bullets recovered are
usually examined visually by experts.
Is this
"Ballistic DNA" or "Ballistic Fingerprinting"?
Absolutely
not.
Unlike DNA or fingerprints that do not change over time, the unique
marks that can identify a particular bullet or shell casing change
due to a number of environmental and use factors. Barrels and
operating parts of firearms change with use, wear and tear over
time. Moreover, a person can, within minutes, use a file to scratch
marks in a barrel or breech face, or replace a firing pin,
extractor, and barrel thereby giving a firearm a completely "new"
ballistic identity. Imaging remains a tool, but not a silver bullet,
in criminal investigations.
What about a
National Ballistic Imaging Database?
The creation of
a national database that would store ballistic images from all
firearms sold would involve huge costs to the government, firearms
manufacturers, and customers. It raises questions about a legal
"chain of evidence" (i.e., how to handle and store hundreds of
millions of bullets or shell casings without exposing all such
evidence to attack by defense lawyers), possibly break existing law
by creating a database of legal firearms owners, and prove much less
effective than NIBIN.
A recent study
completed by the California Department of Forensic Services on
creating a statewide ballistic imaging network stated that: "When
applying this technology to the concept of mass sampling of
manufactured firearms, a huge inventory of potential candidates will
be generated for manual review. This study indicates that this
number of candidate cases will be so large as to be impractical and
will likely create logistic complications so great that they can not
be effectively addressed." The study pointed out that when
expanding the database of spent shell casings, the system will
generate so many "hits" that could be potential matches, it would
not be of any use to forensic examiners. Other problems included
guns making different markings on casings from different ammunition
manufacturers; the shipping, handling, and storage of spent shell
casings; some firearms do not leave marks that can be traced back to
that particular firearm; and the system demands highly-trained
personnel for proper operation.
Maryland and
New York Ballistic Imaging Programs
Maryland
introduced its own ballistic imaging system in 2000. Every new
handgun that is sold in the state must be accompanied by spent shell
casings for input into the imaging network. According to
Maryland
budget figures, approximately $5 million has been spent on the
system. According to Maryland law enforcement officials, it contains
over 11,000 imaged cartridges, has been queried a total of 155 times
and has not been responsible for solving any crimes.
In New York,
there have been thousands of cartridges entered into their database
and, according to reports, no traces have resulted in criminal
prosecutions.
Guns in
Private Hands
There are an
estimated 260 million firearms in private hands. It would be
virtually impossible to retrieve these firearms for ballistics
documentation without violating the constitutional rights of
millions of law abiding firearms owners.
How Best to
Use Ballistic Imaging Technology
There is a proposal
in Congress, the Ballistic Imaging Evaluation and Study Act,
introduced in both the House and Senate (by Representative Melissa
Hart, R-PA, and Senator Zell Miller, D-GA) that orders the
Department of Justice to contract for a study by the National
Academy of Sciences, which would examine the many questions
surrounding imaging technology and provide a list of recommendations
to policymakers and Congress. Enacting the legislation to begin this
study is a priority. The proper allocation of funds to fight crime
is critical to ensuring safe communities. The study outlined in the
legislation will provide firm scientific conclusions on which to
base decisions on how best to deploy this technology.
Miles E. Hall
Founder & President
H&H
Gun
Range
* Shooting Sports Outlet
I-40 & Meridian
400 South Vermont,
Suite 110
Oklahoma City,
Oklahoma
73108-1034
(405) 947-3888
ext.111
|